2016 Champagne: Harvest Report

BY ANTONIO GALLONI | APRIL 11, 2017 

My annual spring tastings of vins clairs suggest 2016 is an uneven vintage in Champagne. The wines I tasted were on the softer, more open-knit side of things relative to how vins clairs show in the very best vintages. Of course, vins clairs will go through several transformations as they are blended and bottled to become Champagne, and then aged prior to being disgorged and ultimately released, a process that takes a minimum of a few years. These are some early observations.

The Growing Season

Two thousand sixteen got off to a rocky start in Champagne. A frost on April 27 and 28 lowered potential yields anywhere from 10% to as much as 100% in the most extreme (but rare) cases. Rain during May through July was three times higher than normal, which, among other things, led to high mildew pressure and resulting in lower potential yields. Warm, dry weather arrived in late July, when I visited the vineyards, and continued into August. Temperatures were high enough to stress the vines and even burn grapes in some spots. Conditions improved towards the end of the season. Rain just before harvest was especially problematic in the Côtes de Blancs. It is a year in which being able to be nimble in the vineyards was absolutely critical. For that reason, on paper, 2016 favors small, grower estates where proprietors and their workers can get into vineyards quickly, on a Saturday or Sunday if needed, as opposed to the larger houses that by definition have much less flexibility in their labor forces. On average, yields are down 33%.

Uneven ripening, with a high incidence of millerandage (shot berries) in Chardonnay as seen on July 27, 2016 

"Maturation for the Pinot Noirs was pretty even,” Guillaume Selosse told me. “For the Chardonnays it was a different story altogether. Ripening was highly uneven, not just within bunches themselves but also from vine to vine, where there was a high degree of variation. These conditions made choosing the right moment to harvest very difficult.” I heard similar comments at many addresses. A contrarian view was offered by Jean-Baptiste Lécaillon at Roederer. “In my view, 2016 is a Chardonnay vintage, but we had to wait until very late in the season to achieve the levels of ripeness we were looking for. The Pinots had a slightly shorter vegetative cycle (Editors note: the time between flowering and ripening) of around 88-89 days, but the Chardonnays got the benefit of the full 100 days that is considered one of the hallmarks of a high quality vintage.” 

The 2016 Vins Clairs

In my view, 2016 is an average to perhaps slightly higher than average vintage that, for most houses, especially the large players, is probably best suited to reserve wines as opposed to tête de cuvées. I expect the tête de cuvées that are made to be bottled in relatively small amounts. 

The Pinot Noirs and Meuniers are generally a notch or two above the Chardonnays. While I did not see any wines with significant flaws, I have also been doing this long enough to know the likelihood of a producer, small or large, showing a vin clair with an obvious flaw is close to zero. It is hardly a coincidence that this year producers showed fewer Chardonnay samples than in years past.