2006 Gevrey-Chambertin Cherbaudes 1er Cru
00
Subscriber Access Only
or Sign Up
You'll Find The Article Name Here
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Integer vitae aliquam odio. Aliquam purus diam, tempor et consectetur vitae, eleifend ac quam. Proin nec mauris ac odio iaculis semper. Integer posuere pharetra aliquet. Nullam tincidunt sagittis est in maximus. Donec sem orci, vulputate ac quam non, consectetur fermentum diam. In dignissim magna id orci dignissim convallis. Integer sit amet placerat dui. Aliquam pharetra ornare nulla at vulputate. Sed dictum, mi eget fringilla lacinia, nisl tortor condimentum mi, vitae ultrices quam diam ac neque. Donec hendrerit vulputate felis, fringilla varius massa.
- By Author Name on Month Date, Year
Jean-Marie Fourrier, a flexible vigneron who adapts his vineyard work to the needs of each growing season, explained why 2006 could be so successful in the Cote de Nuits. "We had a very hot July, as in 1976," he began. "This stunted the size of the berries until the veraison. Luckily, heat at this stage of the season doesn't have an impact on acidity. And in fact the fruit kept all its acidity during the veraison. August was then cool and cloudy. Our fruit was not sensitive to rot due to the hard grape skins. There was more rain as you went south to the Maconnais." Fourrier, who does not believe in pulling leaves in mid-July, noted that this strategy would have been a disaster in 2006, as it would have exposed the fruit to the late July hailstorm. (He did his effeuillage in late August in 2007, 2006 and 2004.) There were actually three waves of storms, in mid-July, the beginning of August and mid-August, he went on. Vines planted along a north-south axis in Chambolle-Musigny were the least affected, while Griottes-Chambertin, Petite Chapelle and Clos de Beze were the worst hit by hail. Fourrier told me he did more pigeages than usual in 2006 to extract tannins, due to the tough skins and to the fact that he also has a high percentage of old vines. "A local lab said that in 2006, the grapes achieved 75% phenolic maturity but 50% extractability by what they call natural processes," he told me, "whereas in 2007 there was only 50% phenolic maturity but 90% extractability." Grape sugars in 2006 ranged from 12.8% to 13.4%, which Fourrier described as surprisingly high, and higher than those of 2005.