2006 Chablis Montmains 1er Cru
00
Subscriber Access Only
or Sign Up
You'll Find The Article Name Here
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Integer vitae aliquam odio. Aliquam purus diam, tempor et consectetur vitae, eleifend ac quam. Proin nec mauris ac odio iaculis semper. Integer posuere pharetra aliquet. Nullam tincidunt sagittis est in maximus. Donec sem orci, vulputate ac quam non, consectetur fermentum diam. In dignissim magna id orci dignissim convallis. Integer sit amet placerat dui. Aliquam pharetra ornare nulla at vulputate. Sed dictum, mi eget fringilla lacinia, nisl tortor condimentum mi, vitae ultrices quam diam ac neque. Donec hendrerit vulputate felis, fringilla varius massa.
- By Author Name on Month Date, Year
"The 2005s are significantly higher in acidity than the 2006s as well as more concentrated," said cellarmaster Patrick Piuze, "but the 2006s may be more typical Chablis due to their balance. They're more minerally and less fruit-driven wines. They're not bombs but they have finesse, structure and personality." Piuze admitted that most of his colleagues in Chablis prefer their 2005s, but noted that this may be partly because there was less room for error in 2006 due to the narrow window for harvesting ripe, healthy fruit. (I also got the feeling that Piuze has taken the Brocard wines to a higher level in 2006.) He used very little press wine in 2006 as the pHs of this juice tended to be too high. Following quick alcoholic and malolactic fermentations, all the wines except for the Clos were racked in mid-February. Piuze planned to use a bit more CO2 than usual to retain maximum freshness. (Martine's Wines, Novato, CA) Also recommended: 2005 Chablis Vieilles Vignes Domaine Sainte-Claire (86), 2005 Chablis Vau de Vey (86).