### The 1996 Champagnes Revisited

###   

###   

| 

1996

 | 

Moët et Chandon Dom Pérignon

 | 

95

 |
| 

1996

 | 

Moët et Chandon Dom Pérignon Rosé

 | 

96

 |
| 

1996

 | 

Ruinart Dom Ruinart

 | 

93

 |
| 

1996

 | 

Krug Vintage

 | 

98

 |
| 

1996

 | 

Krug Clos du Mesnil

 | 

99

 |
| 

1996

 | 

Salon

 | 

97+

 |
| 

1996

 | 

Philipponnat Clos des Goisses

 | 

96

 |
| 

1996

 | 

Billecart-Salmon Clos Saint-Hilaire

 | 

96

 |
| 

1996

 | 

Jacques Selosse Grand Cru Blanc de Blancs

 | 

94

 |
| 

1996

 | 

Pol Roger Sir Winston Churchill

 | 

95

 |
| 

1996

 | 

Roederer Cristal

 | 

96

 |
| 

1996

 | 

Bollinger R.D.

 | 

96

 |

1996 remains one of the great modern-day vintages for Champagne. The wines possess a combination of bright acidity and high sugars that is extremely rare. The best 1996 Champagnes are bold, racy and exuberant, in both absolute and relative terms, something that has also come across in numerous recent tastings, including verticals of Dom Pérignon, Cristal, Krug and Dom Ruinart. For all of these houses 1996 is one of the more powerful, extroverted vintages of the last 15 or so years.

To be sure, the vintage also has its critics. Those who are skeptical of the vintage claim that some producers harvested too early and that a number of wines possess excessively austere and lean personalities that will never soften. My experience with the Champagnes below and others, however, has mostly been extremely positive and I am convinced the best wines have enough balance of fruit and acidity to age gracefully, in some cases for decades.

Both 1996 Dom Pérignons are gorgeous and have the potential to continue to develop beautifully for many years. The **1996 Dom Pérignon** shows all of the classic notes of this wine in an exuberant, big style. Smoke, spices and roasted nuts are some of the nuances that emerge from this classy and very complete Dom Pérignon. The **1996 Dom Pérignon Rosé** is brilliant from start to finish, and this bottle is one of the finest I have had. Sweet, expansive and generous, the wine blossoms on the palate with extraordinary grace as layers of silky, perfumed fruit open up in the glass. This is a beautiful Dom Pérignon Rosé. The **1996 Dom Ruinart** is particularly large-scaled for this generally subtle wine, an impression that was reinforced when I tasted a large number of vintages a few months ago. This is a bold, weighty Dom Ruinart that continues to change in the glass, revealing new shades of its smoke and mineral-infused fruit with every taste. The 1996 is a particularly good vintage for Dom Ruinart, and also one of the more accessible Champagnes of that year.

The two wines from Krug are simply breathtaking. The **1996 Krug Vintage** is explosive on the palate, as layers of aromas and flavors meld together in a stunning display of elegance and power. This pure, sensual beauty is utterly rapturous. The relatively generous style of this wine makes it hard to resist today, but it will age for decades. This is a brilliant wine in every way. Hard as it may seem to believe, the **1996 Krug Clos du Mesnil** is even better. Still painfully young, the wine reveals incredible detail in a vivid expression of white peaches, flowers and minerals. While the Vintage is exuberant and expressive, the Clos du Mesnil is all about subtlety, finesse and an incredibly understated, feminine style of Champagne. This is surely one of the most profound wines that have ever passed my lips, and my only hope is that I will have an opportunity to taste it again at some point in the future. For now, the 1996 Clos du Mesnil remains a reference-point wine of the very highest level. This bottle of the **1996 Salon** is like every other bottle I have had recently, which is to say tight, tight, tight. Still, this painfully unevolved, mineral-driven wine shows tons of potential in its floral, white fruits. In a recent tasting of the 1979 Champagnes, the Salon was one of the finest wines, but it needed several hours of air to open up. Although the 1996 is pure magic in a glass, it remains a wine for the exceedingly patient.

**Philipponnat’s**  **1996 Clos des Goisses** is one of the more approachable wines in this vintage. Made in a slightly oxidative style, it reveals lovely complexity in a richly-textured, expansive personality, with a pretty vein of minerality that frames the long finish. The **Clos Saint-Hilaire,**  **Billecart-Salmon’s** old-vine, single-vineyard Blanc de Noirs, is another of the more accessible **1996s**. Ripe pears, minerals and flowers appear in this generous, textured Champagne. This delicate, sublime wine is drinking beautifully today. **Jacques Selosse’s 1996 Grand Cru Blanc de Blancs** is exotic and sweet, in a style that combines plenty of ripe fruit with the intensely mineral-driven style of the vintage. This is a beautiful, structured Champagne although it doesn’t seem to match the profound level achieved by the finest wines of the vintage. The **1996 Pol Roger Sir Winston Churchill** is an immensely rewarding, complete Champagne that is drinking well today but that also has the potential to continue to improve in bottle. Nothing in particular stands out here, but as is often the case with this cuvee, I am struck by the wine’s awesome balance and supreme harmony. Simply put, this is a strikingly beautiful wine from Pol Roger.

**Roederer’s 1996 Cristal** is gorgeous. The expressive, floral bouquet melds seamlessly into an expansive palate of sweet fruit. This is an exceptionally polished and finessed Cristal, but like so many vintages, it needs time in bottle, regardless of how rewarding it is today. Even after all of these great 1996s, the Cristal delivers the goods. The **1996 R.D. from Bollinger** is another superb wine from this vintage. An expressive bouquet of spices, acacia blossoms and perfumed fruit emerges from the wine’s silky-textured frame. This generous R.D. is drinking well today, but also has enough freshness to age well for years. It is a great version of one of Champagne’s legendary wines.

-- Antonio Galloni



The 1996 Champagnes Revisited

The 1996 Champagnes Revisited (Jan 2009)

ConstantScore(-article_id:{312 381 422 466 735 1092 1114 1146 1208 1209 1210 1231 1235 1241 1242 1245 1249 1258 1261 1276 1283 1298 1302 1312 1321 1325 1338 1601 1734 1980 1998 2164 2193 2198 2268 2425 2529 2566 2825 2994 3120 3140 3371 3977 4341 4846 4847 4848} #producer.id:2504 #article_id:[118 TO 118])

DocValuesFieldExistsQuery [field=_primary_term]

Jacques Selosse

Content

Engage

Vinous

Social