2012 &amp; 2013 Barbaresco&nbsp;– A Study in Contrasts

Readers will find two very different sets of wines in the 2012 and 2013 Barbarescos. The 2012s are open-knit, supple and ready to drink, while the 2013s -&nbsp;from one of the latest years in recent memory - embody all the qualities that make&nbsp;Nebbiolo one of the world's most noble grapes; soaring aromatics, pulsating energy, structure,&nbsp;and, most importantly, the rare ability to transmit the essence&nbsp;of site.2012 – Slow to Start,
Slow to Finish


















The 2012s are attractive wines from a vintage that appears
to be best suited to near-term drinking. Many wines show the elevated ripeness
from a period of intensely hot weather in early August, but at the same time
the 2012s are decidedly medium in body, without the opulence found in the
2011s, another vintage marked by warm temperatures. One of the shortcomings of
2012 is that vineyard signatures are not fully developed, which results in an
element of sameness across many wines. Overall, 2012 is an average vintage with a few overachievers and large number of wines that will offer their best drinking sooner rather than later.&nbsp;

The growing season&nbsp;got off to a difficult start. The winter
was brutally cold. In Burgundy, the cold killed quite a few plants in lower
lying areas. Mother Nature was kinder to Piedmont. Flowering was late and took
place under cold, damp conditions, which caused a loss of around 10-20% of the
potential crop. Periods of warmth alternated with cooler spells in an up and
down season with little regularity. A blast of heat in early August was so
severe it caused dehydration. The rest of the summer was overcast, with
moderate temperatures and very little sun. Hail was an issue in a few spots,
including Asili and Pajè. Nevertheless, sugar readings were on the high side heading
into harvest. A final spell of rain just before harvest was the final wrinkle
growers had to deal with in what turned out to be a difficult year.

It’s always a challenge to make generalizations about
Piedmont, as there are so many subtleties with each twist and turn of these
snaking, hillside vineyards. Still, the data I was able to compare from weather
stations in Monforte and Barbaresco showed that Barbaresco had higher average
temperatures, higher peaks, along with 25% more rain and 19% more growing degree
days.

Of course, one has to keep in mind that parts of the town of
Barbaresco is next to the Tanaro river and its warming influence and that
Barbaresco sits lower than Monforte, so warmer temperatures alone may not be
that significant. But the differences in rainfall and growing degree days are
too significant to ignore.

Interestingly, sugar levels and polyphenols track recent
historical averages, but anthocyanins, which are developed through diurnal
shifts towards the end of the growing season, are quite a bit lower than those
that one might see in a more classic year, such as 2013. This may explain why
the 2012s are both ripe, deep and juicy, but also lacking in color. Wine rarely
comes down to numbers alone, but some of the keys to unlocking the essence of
the 2012 vintage might lie in understanding those figures. 

<img alt="" src="https://allgrapes.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads%2F1449155555601-DSC04854+%281%29.jpg">

Cole and Montefico as
seen from Ronchi, Barbaresco

2013 – Regal
Classicism

Two thousand thirteen, on the other hand, is shaping up to
be an epic vintage of classic proportions and superb pedigree. The growing
season was much more stable than 2012, but it is the last month of the year, a
perfect September with warm days and cool nights, that yielded Barbarescos
endowed with regal intensity. The 2013s remind me of the 2010s, but with more
inner sweetness and mid-palate richness. Vinous readers will recall that 2010
was an uneven vintage in Barbaresco. From what I have seen so far, 2013 does
not have the austerity nor the inconsistency of 2010. The late October harvest
was one of the latest on record. Some of the region’s younger producers told me
they had never seen such a late-maturing vintage!<img alt="" src="https://allgrapes.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads%2F1449170767897-DSC04848.jpg"> 

The lower slopes of Treiso

Barbaresco’s Void in
Leadership

For the last several decades, Barbaresco has been defined by
three producers who have towered above all others; Bruno Giacosa, Angelo Gaja
and the Produttori del Barbaresco. Giacosa seems to be gradually coming back to
form after the disappointing 2008s and 2009s, which is a very good sign. Gaja
is in the middle of a generational transition, a delicate period for any estate
that always takes at least a few years. The Produttori are as consistent and
reliable as ever, but the lack of association with a single producer is in many
ways a hindrance.

It doesn’t take much time in Piedmont to realize how much
more visibility Barolo has compared to Barbaresco. Much of that can be attributed to Barolo's long-standing presence in&nbsp;export markets. The vast majority of Barolo is sold outside Italy,&nbsp;so the client
base is international by nature. The exact opposite is true of Barbaresco,
which, up until recently, was mostly sold in Italy. As a result, Barbaresco is
a very insular place. What Barbaresco needs today is someone who can&nbsp;show the world just how compelling these wines are, but it will take a person&nbsp;with the
kind of outward vision Angelo Gaja had in the late 1960s, naturally adapted to today’s sensibilities.
The road is wide open for one or more producers to take that leadership position.&nbsp;

<img alt="" src="https://allgrapes.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads%2F1449155581534-DSC04761.jpg">

The barrel room at
Produttori del Barbaresco

Some Background

Bruno Giacosa is without any doubt Barbaresco’s first
modernist producer. In 1964, Giacosa made the first vineyard designate
Barbaresco, his 1964 Santo Stefano Riserva, a wine that remains exhilaratingly
beautiful to this day. A close look at the label reveals the vineyard name as
‘Cru Santo Stefano di Neive d’Alba.’ Single-vineyard wines have become all the
rage in the last fifty years, but they are not part of the Piedmontese
tradition. Rather, these wines&nbsp;reflect an infatuation with French culture (which can
also be seen in the use of the word ‘cru’) that was sweeping through Piedmont
in the early 1960s.

Giacosa’s desire to bottle his own wines showed he was not
afraid to challenge his father, a grape broker by trade, who was not at all
pleased with the potential for conflicts of interest if and when the young
Giacosa decided to keep the best fruit for himself. Giacosa dealt with that
concern by offering to pay double the going rate for his fruit. Bruno Giacosa
was also among the first producers to use French oak, install temperature-controlled
stainless steel fermenters and send his wines to an outside lab for analysis. Although
often thought of as a traditionalist, in his day Bruno Giacosa was among the
most innovative and daring producers in Piedmont.

Angelo Gaja started working in his family’s winery in the
late 1960s and joined full-time in the early 1970s. While Giacosa is a man of
few words who has rarely travelled outside Piedmont, Gaja is the exact
opposite. Speaking and moving at the speed of light, Gaja lives at a pace that
is nearly impossible to keep up with, even today. Gaja is the great evangelist
of Barbaresco. He took the magic of these hills and exported it around the
world. Back home, Gaja adopted a host of modern vinification techniques and molded
his wines to more American/international sensibilities in an effort to show his
wines could compete with the world’s benchmarks for excellence.

But in a battle between Gaja and Nebbiolo, Nebbiolo always
wins, as evidenced by how well even Gaja’s most internationally-styled wines
have aged and maintained their vineyard signatures. Daughters Gaia and Rossana&nbsp;have pulled things back and are going for a bit more restraint, goals they are
pursuing with the work ethic and total drive for perfection they inherited from
their parents. The next chapter at Gaja is going to be fascinating to follow.

Just up the road, Aldo Vacca has deftly brought the
Produttori del Barbaresco into modern times while making subtle changes to
farming and winemaking yet maintaining the traditional style that has made this
coop so adored by its rabidly loyal fan base. The changes at Produttori have
been gradual to the degree they aren’t always so noticeable, but they are
there. No one knows every nook and cranny of Barbaresco better than Aldo Vacca,
but Vacca has also proven to be incredibly wise in making choices that have
positioned the Produttori for much continued success in the future.

<img alt="" src="https://allgrapes.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads%2F1449155533023-DSC04825.jpg">

Steep hillside
contours from the top of Asili

Barbaresco’s Emerging
Young Producers

All of which brings us to the present and future. Many of
today’s most exciting Barbarescos are being made by the new generation of young
producers. Andrea Sottimano has taken what he has seen in Burgundy and applied
it to his Barbarescos with increasing success over the last decade. Francesco
Rocca is younger and less experienced, but his father, Bruno Rocca, owns a
number of top-flight vineyards including what is widely regarded as the very
best part of Rabajà. Based on the quality of vineyard holdings alone, Rocca
should be a top five producer in Barbaresco every year. Silvia Rivella and her
father Guido, who are just now releasing their first wines, are sure to make a
splash. Just across the valley, Marco Rocca’s La Ca’ Nova is probably the
Barbaresco estate with the most potential. At their best, the wines are
fabulous. In Treiso, Giorgio Pelissero makes racy, luscious Barbarescos full of
personality. That is just the tip of the iceberg. Albino Rocca, Fiorenzo Nada and Piero Busso
are some of the other estates where generational transition is under way.

It is pretty clear that Barbaresco’s future is in the hands
of today’s emerging young growers and winemakers. But Barbaresco’s producers
need to get out more and eradicate a culture of insularity that has been the
region’s Achilles heel for so long. Given what I have seen so far, I am optimistic that can happen.

You Might Also Enjoy

<a target="_blank" href="http://vinous.com/articles/historic-piedmont-a-trip-back-in-time-nov-2015">Historic Piedmont: A Trip Back In Time</a>, Antonio Galloni, Nov 2015 <a target="_blank" href="http://vinous.com/articles/piedmont-2015-sep-2015">Piedmont 2015</a>, Antonio Galloni, Sep 2015 <a target="_blank" href="http://vinous.com/articles/2011-barolo-the-here-and-now-mar-2015">2011 Barolo: The Here and Now</a>, Antonio Galloni, Mar 2015 <a target="_blank" href="http://vinous.com/articles/gaja-sori-san-lorenzo-1971-2011-nov-2014">Gaja: Sorì San Lorenzo 1971-2011</a>, Antonio Galloni, Nov 2014 <a target="_blank" href="http://vinous.com/statics/barbaresco_map">Interactive Vineyard Map of Barbaresco</a>-- Antonio Galloni

Content

Engage

Vinous

Social